Jump to content

Talk:Joel Farabee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleJoel Farabee has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 16, 2021Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 25, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in 2019 Joel Farabee became the first player born in the 2000s to become a Philadelphia Flyers player?

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Joel Farabee/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 19:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Reviewing later. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 19:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I just finished watching the game today, and he just scored a goal. That means the stats need updating.
  • The lead could use more of his college career and his career with the Flyers so far. Done
  • Does Dave have any profession?  Done
    • Business owner
  • Link Ottawa in the lead. Done
  • Change "NCAA Division 1" to NCAA Division I. Done
  • Link University of New Hampshire. Done
  • "6-1, 160 pounds" Conversions needed.
  • "first-round" Don't think the hyphen is needed. Done
  • Ref 28 doesn't explicitly say Farabee was on the team. Done
  • On the awards table, the third column's first cell needs some type of label. Done
  • If you can, ref 20 should be replaced with a better source. Done

That should be it. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 05:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nova Crystallis, thanks for the review (didn't realize you're a Philly fan). I will work on these changes ASAP and add something about the 2021 season. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 01:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk19:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • article promoted to good article on Jan. 16 - check.
  • Way long enough at 9000 characters - check.
  • Citations exist, are plentiful, and pass spot-check. Hook is directly cited. Check.
  • No disputes, BLP-compliant. Check.
  • No close paraphrasing, via the Earwig tool. I made one wee change. Check.
  • Neutral. Check.
  • Hook looks properly formatted and appropriate length to me. The main hook was hook-y enough to catch my attention. (Really, they let people born in the 2000s into pro sports now? They didn't in my day! Get off my lawn!) I strongly prefer the main hook to alt-2, which is just a more-specific version of the main hook. That said, others may prefer the second hook, which is also cited and clearly written. I'd go with the first 'cause it's more general-interest, but YMMV.
  • I don't see a QPQ review. I might be missing something - I'll ask the nominator on their talk page. Once that's done, this is good to go!Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moishe Rosenbaum (talk) 22:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added this to the Special occasion holding area. SL93 (talk) 05:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]